This is for his realization.....
IS HE CHICKEN? HE SHOULDN'T HAVE ACCEPTED THE ROLE OF CLARK KENT IN SMALLVILLE IN THE FIRST PLACE IF HE WASN'T HAVING THE SLIGHTEST INTENT TO PLAY SUPERMAN IN THE MOVIES.
I MEAN, HE HAS ALREADY HOARDED A BIG FOLLOWING AND NOT PLAYING THE ROLE WOULD SURELY DISSAPPOINT THESE FANS. HOW CAN HE EXPECT THEN TO MAKE IT BIG IN OTHER FILM PROJECTS.
I HOPE HE REALIZES THAT IT IS THE VOICE OF MAJORITY THAT WANTS HIM IN. AND HE'S GIVING WARNER BROTHERS A REALLY HARD TIME CHOOSING A REPLACEMENT FOR HIM.
I HOPE HE'S READING THIS, OTHERWISE, I WILL START A PETITION FROM NOW ON TO BOYCOTT SMALLVILLE (WHICH I HOPE WON'T EVER HAPPEN)
ON A LIGHTER NOTE, IF HE HAD THE CHANCE TO WATCH THE DOCUMENTARY INCLUDED IN DVD SUPERMAN THE MOVIE, IT'S SUGGESTING THAT ONE CANNOT FULLY TRUST WARNER BROTHERS' DECISION IN IMPLEMENTING THE FILM BECAUSE ALL THEY CARE ABOUT IS THE RETURN OF INVESTMENT. THEY EVEN REMOVED THE ORIGINAL DIRECTOR OF SUPERMAN THE MOVIE ONCE THEY LEARNED THAT THAT MOVIE WAS A BOX OFFICE HIT. ERGO, THE MOVIES FOLLOWING THE ORIGINAL(PART 3 & 4) WASN'T THAT IMPRESSIVE ANYMORE.
(PART 1 & 2 WAS DIRECTED SIMULTANEOUSLY)
I KNOW THAT MANY PEOPLE ARE AWARE THAT SUPERMAN IS A "PROPERTY" OF WB. BUT IN ALL THOSE YEARS, WHY DIDN'T WB MAKE A MOVIE ABOUT SUPERMAN RIGHT AWAY, UNTIL ONLY OUTSIDE PRODUCERS (ILYA SALKIND WAS ONE OF THEM) STARTED PLACING INTEREST ON FILMING THE MOVIE.
THAT ONLY GOES TO PROVE THAT QUALITY OF THE FILM DOES NOT DEPEND ON THE WARNER BROS. BUT ON THE PASSION AND WISDOM OF THE DIRECTOR AS WELL AS ON THE CASTING OF THE MOVIE.
ANYWAY, TOM BULK UP NOW AND PREPARE FOR THE SUPERMAN ROLE....