|
Title: Maybe I'm wrong, but... Post by: Genis Vell on March 18, 2006, 09:15:13 AM I noticed that "For tomorrow" hasn't been very appreciated in the US, despite its place in the top ten (caused by Lee's name on the covers, of course).
Am I wrong? For now, I can only tell that I really loved this storyline, one of the few post-Crisis stories able to be interesting and complex like the pre-Crisis ones. It's a good story about moral, and the role of Superman in the world: I couldn't hate it! More comments later. Title: Re: Maybe I'm wrong, but... Post by: Sword of Superman on March 23, 2006, 04:33:26 PM I noticed too,my opinion is that is a good story,but i find the way that Azzarello use for telling a story is sometimes too much confusing :? ,perhaps even"unsuitable"for Superman.
Maybe this would be one of the reason that it has not rendered too much popular this story-arc. Title: Re: Maybe I'm wrong, but... Post by: Genis Vell on March 24, 2006, 03:43:50 PM Thank you, Sword.
Hey, just one reply? Don't be shy! Title: Re: Maybe I'm wrong, but... Post by: DBN on March 25, 2006, 01:13:04 AM Between Superman threatening to destroy the Earth, ecessive brooding, the appearance of yet another Post-Crisis Zod, another interpretation of the Phantom Zone, and confusing plot. It just wasn't worth it. Complete waste of money IMO.
Title: Re: Maybe I'm wrong, but... Post by: Klar Ken T5477 on March 25, 2006, 07:23:09 AM didnt read it
Title: Re: Maybe I'm wrong, but... Post by: NotSuper on March 26, 2006, 01:13:57 AM It started off well, but got more and more incomprehensible as time went on. I hate to use a buzzword like "decompressed," but "For Tomorrow" was way too decompressed (that is to say the negative version of decompression--sometimes it's helpful for a story to be decompressed).
That being said, I did enjoy Azzarello's Lex Luthor: Man of Steel. |