Superman Through the Ages! Forum

Paul Levitz, who wrote the Legion for twelve years, once famously said that there are so many Legionnaires, that the are, in his own tragic choice of words, "disposable:" an awful lot of Legionnaires died.

The Silver Age Legion under Ed Hamilton and Jim Shooter had Lightning Lad bite the big one...and later on, so did Ferro Lad, and the first Proty sacrificed himself to bring LL back to life. Computo killed one of Triplicate Girl's bodies, making her Duo Damsel.

We've got to remember that someone dying in a comic book at this time is a truly rare thing. FOUR deaths in a team is pretty astonishing. The only other death I can think of off the top of my head at this time is Professor X in the original X-MEN series, before it was revealed that his death was "actually" the death of a lookalike imposter named Changeling.

Moving past the Silver Age, ERG-1 also died in his first appearance in that famous Cary Bates story.

Who was it that lied and called the Legion "the Archies in space?" Because boy, were they wrong. There's a real undercurrent of death in this entire book.

Paul certainly proved this to be the case in his lengthy tenure; the most notable casualty was Karate Kid during the story involving the colossal Legion of Super-Villains led by Nemesis Kid (who himself died in that story, defeated by Projectra).

Legionnaires - and this is in the SILVER AGE  here, people - are more likely to lose their powers (as Bouncing Boy did), get limbs blown off (Lightning Lad), get expelled from the team (as Ultra Boy, Superboy, Supergirl, Star Boy and Dream Girl all were at one point or another), and even get fat, as Matter Eater Lad did.

Paul's choice of words was really, really tragic (and you'd better believe the obsessive Legion fandom erupted in a massive spitstorm). But still, is Paul right? Legion history seems to say yes, but I'm not sure.

I suppose it would be...MORE...fair to say that some Legionnaires are disposable and others are not.

For instance, the Legion Founders shouldn't die - they, and characters that joined so early on they have become essential to the Legion identity, like Superboy, Brainiac 5, Mon-El, Chameleon Boy, and Ultra Boy.

And then there are characters that have received stories that so define them it would not be worth it to kill them off: for instance, after Roy Thomas's Legion issues I would never want to see anything happen to Blok, or anything to happen to Levitz's "smart blonde" Dream Girl.

But there are some Legionnaires I can't find it in me to really care about or like, and if they died it would be shocking but not trigger righteous indignation: Colossal Boy never really had that interesting a personality, and Star Boy never got anything to do. I can't think of any capacity, except for the "Fatal Five" story where she was first introduced, where Shadow Lass really played a significant role. She can die too.

The entire Doom Patrol died in the last issue of their original run -- that was rather shocking for its time.  Granted, many came back in later incarnations (even Rita Farr in the often-maligned John Byrne version), but their first heroic sacrifice is still remembered by fans.

Even though she had earlier resigned, Supergirl's death during the Crisis deeply affected the Legion, especially poor Brainy.  In fact, Supergirl's memorial statue remained at Legion headquarters long after she was officially "forgotten" by DC.   ;)

And as for "Founders" and other "Essential" Legionnaires, remember that DC mandated that the Legion commit the "unthinkable" DEATH of SUPERBOY.   :o  Granted, this Superboy was a retconned "Pocket Universe" replacement, but it was still traumatic witnessing his end.

Of course, the ENTIRE "Five Year Gap" AND "Batch SW6" Legions (plus the whole 30th Century) became "disposable" during Zero Hour.  And so was the "Zero Hour Reboot" Legion that replaced them, leading to the LATEST reboot...   >:(  No wonder many Legion fans have difficulty accepting the current version -- they're now CONDITIONED to EXPECT that the Legion will once more be gutted and rehashed in another five years or so.  If that's the case, why make the emotional committment?   ???

The LSH ceased to exist, like the rest of my beloved DCU suring Crisis on Infinite Earths...

Everything else is a pale imitation

Actually, I see this as a strength of the Legion.  It's a team book, so yes it is possible to kill off some heroes without violating the premise or ruining the strip.  That's not really possible with the JLA, a group of top-tier heroes who can't be seriously harmed without hurting their own ongoing books.  In fact, despite their oppressively huge numbers, even the X-Men have had a hard time making deaths "stick" over the years, and in my opinion that's hurt the title hugely.  The Legion was introduced as a team of equals and for me, while this or that member might be more appealing than the one next to him/her, the group was the important thing.  Members could be killed, and they would STAY dead, which after all is the way to do it.  Deaths were handled seriously, they had impact and they were not casually undone.  And since the reader knew anything was possible, and on any given mission someone might not come home, real suspense and drama was created as in few other books.

I think this is a key to the Legion's popularity.  Much has been made of the teen romance angle and whatnot, but this was a book that made a bunch of young people into the most respected, powerful heroes of their universe, and that's pretty empowering to young readers.  Even the Teen Titans were at best a Junior version of the JLA and their very existence a reminder of their older, more powerful counterparts.  But the LSH was IT...the best and the brightest of their era.  And part of maintaining that prestige was giving them formidable, serious, often terrifyingly lethal opponents.  While the Titans were trying to close the generation gap in Hatton Corners, the Legion was battling the Sun Eater to decide the fate of the solar system.  You can't face the likes of Mordru, the Fatal Five and Universo without being ready to die in battle.  And if it's not a possibility, then you've just got a group of, what, 350 superheroes flying around rescuing kittens from trees.  The Legion was for me like the real-life Foreign Legion...an outfit to join when you're seeking exotic adventure, but one where you're likely as not to end up massacred.

Definitely none of the cute girls like Shadow Lass should go but the idea of characters in jeopardy is a powerful one.  I would be more compelled to have a Legionaire killed on aesthetic grounds and Star Boy's beard and black star costume is number one on the list.

I think the recent Milligan/Allred X-Factor (X-Force? whatever) used the premise of a military style team of heroes who often died combined with the idea of a superhero team run as a profit-making corporation/media monster.  Taking the "dying Legionaire"-genre to the nth degree.  Wasn't Sudicide Squad the same idea as well?

The question attempts to give a weight to American comics they don't deserve.

Anyone who dies can come back anytime. Most have.

This thread, however, puts me in mind of the "ensemble cast" theory regarding American TV shows. Maybe it all started with "Hill Street Blues"; there may be earlier examples. (That show was very popular here.) Apart from one or two key characters (for the sake of continuity), everyone is equally important, equally expendable, much like real life. No matter how much you believe you or a loved one deserves to live, the world as we know it can snatch them away. The rest of us just carry on. The type of comic Americans do incredibly well is the old Superman format: a limited cast of characters who have a new adventure every month, who never age, who never get sick (for long), who never evolve very much... The central cast merely finishes one adventure this week, and starts a new adventure next week.

Apart from anomalies (usually Marvel, as in "Captain Marvel") the American comic creators can't do "death" and should just steer clear of the subject.

As Aldous points out, death is rarely (if ever) permanent in mainstream comics, but I imagine that it served a purpose in the LSH: it made the members more "real" in the eyes of the reader. It was probably easier for the teenaged reader who was their target audience to identify with them if they were shown to be mortal, accident-prone and tragic. It would flatter the reader's sense of teenage angst.

X-Factor, I think. The recent Deadgirl series (which I guiltily enjoyed; I always feel slightly ashamed at liking Allred's stuff so much) even showed how several of the team members had not only died, but gone to hell.

Interesting observation; the Legion were really big-shots that got all the plum missions. Actually in terms of raw power and superior numbers, the Legion may be the most powerful team in the history of comics.

There's a tendency to see the Legion as an extension of the Kirby/Simon "Kid Gang" concept, and if this was ever true (and I don't think it was), it was only very, very early on in the Ed Hamilton days: when the Legion they solved the theft of the Quintile Crystal that powers Metropolis's fusion powersphere...from there on they were officially big shots with official approval. The Legion certainly had a phenomenal amount of prestige and gravitas: during the Sun-Eater story, it was revealed that they were entrusted with the Key to the entire UP fleet's defenses, and we learn in another story that the Legion's fleet of cruisers have A-1 priority in any spaceport in the galaxy. People are always trying to join the Legion...and why not? It's a ticket to prestige and adventure.


Ha ha ha! Interesting point. Boy, it sure felt that way: the fact that bad things happened to the characters was not only something that could happen, but DID.


Interesting, and I agree entirely.

That's a factor that's been extremely overrated, I think, because the only time that the Legionnaires were explicitly TEENS was during the Shooter years when they fought terminally unhip mind-controlled grownups.

There's a belief I just don't agree with at all: because characters start out at a certain age, they should remain in that certain age forever. I for one think arresting the development of a character is a terrible idea because they should be allowed to develop and change, and this is exciting to watch unfold "on camera."

One of the most illegitimate complaints in the world is people whining because Spider-Man is now in his thirties and so on when "he should" be a young college or high school kid. Just because Spider-Man started out a high school kid does not necessarily mean he should remain that way. Nor does it even mean the character's identity is compromised: if my sister got married and pregnant, she doesn't stop being my sister.

A friend of mine once argued that the fact that the Legionnaires and X-Men and Teen Titans, as well as characters like Supergirl, the Vision, and Hawkeye, developed before our eyes, really is a credit not just to the writers but also to something that really rewards long-term and fan readers: watching characters gradually grow and change.

The Avengers and the Justice League never really got any older, but we watched the X-Men and Legionnaires grow up.

This brings me to my next point:


Perhaps this is true for some characters and books, but it is misunderstanding a few things that are unique to the Legion, X-Men, and Teen Titans, and the reason they have such a strong fandom: the idea that because their lives are four-dimensional and change and are REAL, in other words, the reader understands the permanence of something like a pregnancy...or a death.

This is why something like the return of Jean Gray...even though the explanation was very interesting...was the story that provoked more collective outrage and anger than any other I have ever seen, INCLUDING Emerald Twilight. I've talked to people that have refused to even read Marvel comics again because they brought back Marvel Girl. The reason this story pissed so many people off is because it violated a part of what made reading X-Men up until that point so unique: that anything could happen, and as a consequence of that, they would not find some cheesy way to go back to the status quo.

(On a side note, I must say, I have always been fervently against the Superman marriage, but Busiek and Johns have changed my mind on the entire topic because of how warm and interesting in recent times they have made it, not devolving into absurd cliches like Lois wondering if - of all people - SUPERMAN might be unfaithful. Busiek and Johns have made the marriage work and I'm all in favor of it. Spider-Man should be allowed to get older, and Superman should be allowed to get married: it would be leaving him a batchelor indefinitely that would be unfair to the character.)


I don't agree...while there have been lots of pointless shock value deaths, there are enough good examples that I can see the merit in death as a part of drama in a superhero book. The all-time best example would be GIANT SIZED AVENGERS #2 (1974) by Steve Englehart, featuring the death of the Swordsman. He was a loser that never caught a break, and finally he jumped in the path of a ray gun blast meant for a woman that didn't love him and rejected him.

His last words were "I'm just one of those guys that just...doesn't count."

The last panel ended with the Avengers carrying his body mournfully and saying "Every Avenger counts, Swordsman. Every one."

Further proof that Englehart was one of the most influential comics writers, there was a similar death during (I believe) the Gruenwald CAPTAIN AMERICA, where the Porcupine, a small-time enemy, trips and falls on his quills. Captain America gets to him. "It's too late, Cap...I was born a loser and now I'll die a loser too."

Cap grins and says, "No, you won't die one, I swear it."

Later, we see the Porcupine's statue, built by Captain America. It says: HERE LIES THE PORCUPINE: HONORED FOE OF THE AVENGERS.


I don't know about that at all. As much as I loved the great Steve Gerber's seventies run on METAL MEN and their battles against Chemo and the Plutonium Man, what kept me reading the book were the recurring subplots, because I wanted to see what happens in the lives of the characters, whom I like: Platinum's sexually aggressive new personality, Will Magnus recovering from madness, the Metal Men finding jobs despite being robots...

I never have quite understood the "real" argument, since I subscribe to the opinion that comics are for kids and if 16 year old need teens in comics to see what's real, they need to get out of the house more...to me, I like comics because they remind me of how I thought when I was a kid, but other's mileage may vary.

The earlier Legion deaths seemed somewhat different to me, because Lightning Boy's involved coming back after the sacrifice of Proty I, and the Triplicate Girl situation was always odd to me...her duplicates did speak, and its been said they could potentially live separate lives, but their existence always seemed to be to react to a situation and then return to a single person...when one was killed, it SEEMED more like a power was lost as much as life.

Which leaves Ferro Lad as an early example, one where Shooter was pushing an envelope, but I wonder how far it would continue to be pushed, even in his mind.

Not all comics are for kids, though. Most super-hero ones are, I grant you.

I was always very intrigued by Triplicate Girl. I always took the super-power to mean that each of the three girls is equally real, each one is 100 percent Triplicate Girl.

A question I wonder about is when the three girls have done different things in different places, does Triplicate Girl (the whole one) have all their memories and feelings at her disposal? (I would say so.) And does it follow that when she splits into three again, does each of the three once again only have those particular memories and feelings unique to that person -- and when one is killed, as one was, leaving two, are a unique set of memories/experiences lost? I think they would be. (Unless Triplicate Girl, the whole one, consolidates all the separate memories/experiences of the separate three each time they rejoin into the whole...) This also suggests to me the complete Triplicate Girl is a different creature to each of the three separated girls. And yet, they are all 100 percent Triplicate Girl. What a thoroughly confusing (but fun) character.

Pardon me, Julian, but in using "losers" who "don't count" as your examples, you have convinced me even more that what I said is correct. And that sort of maudlin tripe you quoted (involving said nobodies) is exactly why I said what I said about the portrayal of death.

Sorry, Aldous, that's what I was getting at...to me, comics are things that children and adults would read in the 40s en masse, and then threw away...lots of GIs and folks who liked a common literature that they didn't take seriously...there was a lot of pruning in the 50s and then they evolved into parables for young people...and that's where my interest still lies, but sure there are other comics and what remains today.

Your questions about Triplicate Girl are interesting because it is often implied that the duplicates were capable of their own lives and memories, and this may have been stated but I don't remember any stories that went in to it, at least in my reading days of the 1960s.

True, Triplicate Girl's third body dying isn't as significant as say, the death of Lightning Lad, because there are still two other bodies so she can still participate in Legion stories. It not being that significant is not quite the same as it not being a "legit" death, though.

Because it sure as hell felt like a death, it was certainly hideous enough: on the COVER, no less, there was a tentacle wrapped around Luornu's waist simultaneously choking and disintigrating her from the midsection (WRATH OF KHAN-style), and Superboy thinking "this heartless jukebox means business! He just killed Triplicate Girl!"

Somehow I don't think that picture made it to the Legion recruiting poster. :D


I think that the best comics, like the best children's literature too, can be read and appreciated by both children AND adults. As a kid reading comics, the thing that struck me the most about the comics I liked was how they felt very intelligent and complicated, and did not insult the intelligence of the reader; I never read, liked or appreciated any book written exclusively for children, such as Archie or Richie Rich (and I still can't). I for one, do not think superhero adventure comics should be written exclusively for either children or adults. There should be something there for the kid part of our brain (battles and monsters and space travel) and things for the adult part (likeable characters and unpredictable plots).


Interesting speculation. Is it possible the Triplicate Girl body that died was the one that had the crush on Superboy? Because except for her being concerned for him during Superboy's stay on Takron-Galtos, after the death of that body the Triplicate Girl concern for Superboy gradually faded away and she fell in love with Bouncing Boy.

The coolest thing by far about Triplicate Girl's power was how writers were able to somehow cleverly get use out of something as trivial as her power, which as Jim Shooter put it, was "suited to weird sex and not much else." The best example was a Cary Bates backup, "1+1=3" in the back of the first appearance of Tyrok.


I just did a spit-take after reading that. Describing Steve Englehart - of ALL the writers in comics - as "maudlin?" now Roy Thomas, on a bad day, maaaybe. I giggled like a schoolgirl at "the death scream of an ant" and "even an android can cry."

Was the death of the Swordsman over the top? No. Steve Englehart never had a problem with being over the top; he was subdued and his dialogue was natural, and he let powerful emotions speak for themselves. It completed the character of the Swordsman, a story that was all about failure and being unworthy.

Steve Englehart's entire sixteen issue "Celestial Madonna" (his best work apart from his DETECTIVE COMICS) is a story about redeption, and the Swordsman redeeming himself in the end is a part of a larger theme. Even Kang - the villain of the piece - will inevitably get redeemed. The Mantis herself becomes redeemed for her selfishness and cattiness, becoming the Celestial Madonna.

The Swordsman in death, redeemed himself - and to the end he thought he was a loser. WOW.

The Legion has suffered too many reboots at this point.  The last one was, in my own opinion, totally unnecessary.
Certain core Legionnaires were irreplacable, while others could be killed, married off, or exiled without the team suffering.  Each writer had his or her favorites, and tended to ignore certain other Legionnaires.