superman.nufacebook    
  •   forum   •   DON'T MISS: "THE EDGE!" •   fortress   •  
Superman Through the Ages! Forum
News: Superman Through the Ages! now located at theAges.superman.nu
 
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 11, 2019, 10:35:36 PM


Login with username, password and session length


Pages: [1] 2 3 4   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: SIEGELS SUE SMALLVILLE'S SUPERBOY  (Read 13810 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Klar Ken T5477
Council of Wisdom
*
Offline Offline

Posts: leet


Metropolis Prime, NYC, NY USA


WWW
« on: April 05, 2006, 02:02:55 PM »

From Daily Variety: 4/5/06

There's a big dispute in "Smallville."
A federal judge in Los Angeles has found that the WBthe WB's young Superman skeinskein may be infringing on the copyrights held on the Superboy character by the widow and daughter of Jerome Siegel, originator of the comicbook series.

The March 23 summary judgment by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew also found that Joanne Siegel and Laura Siegel Larson had successfully recaptured the Superboy rights as of Nov. 17, 2004.

Lew's rulings in the copyright infringement lawsuit against Time WarnerTime Warner, Warner Bros. and DC ComicsDC Comics throw into question the ownership of "Smallville""Smallville" episodes that have run since November 2004. Lew denied a request by the defendants for a ruling that "Smallville" did not infringe on the Superboy copyrights.

Warner Bros. said in response that it "respectfully disagrees" with the rulings and will pursue an appeal.

Still to be resolved is the question of whether "Smallville" -- now in its fifth season and centered on a teenage Clark Kent -- is actually infringing on the Superboy copyright. No trial date has been set in the suit, filed in 2004.

In their request for partial summary judgment, Siegel and Larson didn't ask for a copyright infringement ruling, which Lew said would require a "detailed factual comparison." But he noted, "Enough facts are presented, where this court, contrary to defendants' request, could find that the main character in 'Smallville' is in fact Superboy."

Lew also added in a footnote, "In the Superboy comic strip, a billboard on the side of a rural country road announces, 'Welcome to Smallville! Home of Superboy."

In response, Warner Bros. also pointed out that the suit is directed solely to rights relating to the costumed character Superboy -- not Superman. "Moreover, the court's ruling does not affect the television series 'Smallville,' which is grounded in depictions of a young Superman that pre-date the publication of Superboy in 1944 and which therefore are not subject to the termination notice, even if valid," Warner added.

Marc Toberoff, who represents Siegel and Larson, told Daily Variety that the only representations of a younger Superman which pre-date 1944 Superboy consist of one or two panels showing Superman as a baby or toddler. "Jerry Siegel's Superboy focuses on Superboy's relationship with his parents and his adventures with school classmates in a small town which, by Superboy No. 2, was named Smallville," he added.

The dispute over who owns Superboy goes back to 1938 -- the same year the first Superman comicbook, based on the story originated by Siegel and illustrator Joseph Shuster, was published.

A few months later, Siegel agreed to provide Detective Comics with a new Superboy comicstrip and submitted a plan that was turned down. Siegel unsuccessfully attempted several more times to pique Detective's interest in Superboy before entering the Army in 1943.

But Detective began publishing Superboy comics in 1944 while Siegel was stationed in the Pacific, resulting in a 1947 lawsuit in which New York state court Judge Addison Young found Siegel to be the sole owner of Superboy. In 1948, Siegel reached a settlement with National Comics Publications (predecessor of DC Comics) in which he sold ownership of Superboy and Superman to National.

Siegel and Shuster sued to regain the Superman copyright in 1973, but lost that suit two years later. Siegel then launched a PR campaign to protest DC Comics' treatment of him and Shuster, placing a "curse" on the upcoming "Superman" film and resulting in Warner Communications awarding annual pensions to the duo along with credit as co-creators.

Shuster died in 1992; Siegel passed away four years later.

The Superboy copyrights -- granted originally for the standard 28 years -- were renewed for another 28 years between 1972 and 1975.

However, Congress amended copyright law in 1976 to extend renewal terms from 28 years to 47 years in order to allow authors and their heirs to recapture copyrights for the extended renewal period. So in late 2002, Joanne Siegel and Laura Siegel Larson served the standard two-year notice they were terminating the 1948 grant of the Superboy copyright.

But in August 2004, DC Comics notified Siegel and Larson it was denying the validity of the termination notice and asserting it would "vigorously oppose" any attempt to exploit the Superboy copyrights. Siegel and Larson filed their suit two months later.

In their legal responses to the Superboy suit, Time Warner and its co-defendants had contended Superboy was simply a younger version of Superman and that Superboy was "work for hire" solely owned by its predecessors. But Lew said those arguments were unpersuasive in light of rulings made by Judge Young in the 1947 trial.

Lew noted that Young had made those determinations after hearing evidence from the parties who were "directly involved" in the original dispute.

"Defendants' attempt to recast Superboy as a 'derivative work' or 'work for hire' stands in stark contrast to Judge Young's conclusion that Detective/National was 'perpetually enjoined and restrained from creating, publishing, selling or distributing' Superboy, based on the fact that Siegel was the sole and exclusive owner," Lew said.

"Defendants' argument also contradicts the fact that Siegel subsequently transferred his exclusive interest in Superboy to National in the May 19, 1948, stipulated settlement. Had Superboy been nothing more than a derivative work, Siegel would have owned no interest in the Superboy property to transfer."

Lew also noted that the defendants' predecessors had relied on Young's rulings in previous cases such as Siegel-Shuster's unsuccessful 1973 suit. "Defendants now take the inconsistent position that this court is not bound by the state court findings, as they relate to Superboy," he wrote.

Toberoff, a specialist in intellectual property, represented Robert B. Clark in his suit against Warner Bros., which was settled last year for at least $17.5 million for infringing on the copyright to the 1974 film "Moonrunners" by making the feature "The Dukes of Hazzard." "Moonrunners" became the basis of the Warner TV series "The Dukes of Hazzard."
Logged
dto
Action Ace
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 415



« Reply #1 on: April 05, 2006, 03:12:10 PM »

So the Siegels have the "Superboy" rights again, eh?

Perhaps that's why DC is drastically changing their Superboys (killing Conner Kent and altering now-villain Superboy-Prime's costume) -- they don't want to bother with potential lawsuits from the Siegels if higher courts uphold their claim.  

Current copyright protections extend to 75 years after the death of the creator.  Will this mean DC won't touch Superboy until after he finally becomes "public domain" in 2071?   :shock:   Hopefully some agreement can be made with the Siegels so DC can continue publishing a Superboy, but judging from past acrimony on both sides perhaps DC is prudent to take such precautionary measures.
Logged

DTO
DBN
Last Son of Krypton
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 274



« Reply #2 on: April 05, 2006, 07:01:45 PM »

Well, the new Legion cartoon has Superboy in it.
Logged
Super Monkey
Super
League of Supermen
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3435



WWW
« Reply #3 on: April 05, 2006, 09:26:35 PM »

DC can use Superboy, but they have to pay the Siegels when they use him.

The lawsuit is from the fact that the Siegels haven't seen a red cent from Smallville.

I guess DC figured, heck as long as we don't call him Superboy (but they actually did as a joke) and as long as he never wears the supersuit, we don't have to pay those darn Siegels and kept all the money for us, hahahaha or something like that Wink

Hey, read this: http://superman.nu/tales3/birthOfSuperboy/
Logged

"I loved Super-Monkey; always wanted to do something with him but it never happened."
- Elliot S! Maggin
TELLE
Supermanica Council
Council of Wisdom
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1702



WWW
« Reply #4 on: April 06, 2006, 06:03:04 AM »

I wonder why Warner would try to deny their legal obligation re: the Siegels and Superboy?  Corporations can't feel.
Logged

Everything you ever wanted to
know about the classic Superman:
Supermanica
The Encyclopedia of Supermanic Biography!
(temporarily offline)
Great Rao
Administrator
Council of Wisdom
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1887



WWW
« Reply #5 on: April 06, 2006, 09:35:13 PM »

More updates:

Siegel Heirs Win Ruling Calling "Smallville" Ownership into ...
http://news.toonzone.net/article.php?ID=9983
Toon Zone - Yonkers,NY,USA
A Los Angeles judge has ruled that the WB network's TV show Smallville may infringe on the copyrights on Superboy held by Joanne Siegel and Laura Siegel Larson ...

STUDIO BRIEFING: April 5th, 2006
http://www.movieweb.com/news/48/11948.php
MovieWeb - USA
... As reported by Daily Variety, the ruling by Judge Ronald SW Lew observed that Joanne Siegel and Laura Siegel Larson had successfully recaptured the copyright ...

More here:
http://news.google.com/news?ie=utf8&oe=utf8&persist=1&hl=en&client=google&ncl=http://news.toonzone.net/article.php%3FID%3D9983

That's Truth, Justice, and the American Way for you!

S!
Logged

"The bottom line involves choices.  Neither gods nor humans have ever stood calmly in a minefield forever.  Good or evil, they are bound to choose.  And when they do, you will see the truth of all that motivates us.  As a thinking being, you have the obligation to choose.  If the fate of all mankind were in your hands, what would your decision be?  As a writer and an artist, I've drawn my answer."   - Jack Kirby
Klar Ken T5477
Council of Wisdom
*
Offline Offline

Posts: leet


Metropolis Prime, NYC, NY USA


WWW
« Reply #6 on: April 07, 2006, 01:25:57 AM »

I salute my imaginary relatives! Smiley
Logged
TELLE
Supermanica Council
Council of Wisdom
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1702



WWW
« Reply #7 on: April 07, 2006, 04:22:24 AM »

This story is just exploding everywhere.  More so than when they won the rights in the first place, because it concerns an active TV property and people are thinking about the movie hype already.
Logged

Everything you ever wanted to
know about the classic Superman:
Supermanica
The Encyclopedia of Supermanic Biography!
(temporarily offline)
Pages: [1] 2 3 4   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

CURRENT FORUM

Archives: OLD FORUM  -  DCMB  -  KAL-L
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM
Entrance ·  Origin ·  K-Metal ·  The Living Legend ·  About the Comics ·  Novels ·  Encyclopaedia ·  The Screen ·  Costumes ·  Read Comics Online ·  Trophy Room ·  Creators ·  ES!M ·  Fans ·  Multimedia ·  Community ·  Supply Depot ·  Gift Shop ·  Guest Book ·  Contact & Credits ·  Links ·  Coming Attractions ·  Free E-mail ·  Forum

Superman created by Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster
The LIVING LEGENDS of SUPERMAN! Adventures of Superman Volume 1!
Return to SUPERMAN THROUGH THE AGES!
The Complete Supply Depot for all your Superman needs!